Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson

  • Victor Coutinho Lage IRI/PUC-Rio CPDOC/FGV-Rio
  • Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon IRI/PUC-Rio
Palavras-chave: international relations theory–modernity–periodization–Walker–Bartelson

Resumo

Critical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’ and, therefore, constraining available avenues for interrogating international politics. We proceed through a double problematization. First, we problematize the role played by periodization in the work of Jens Bartelson and Rob Walker, pointing to the pervasiveness—and yet silence over—this practice in two important moves to open space to think beyond modern political discourse. Second, we problematize periodization as a political practice that regulates past, present, and future, highlighting its double role in both reifying specific conceptions of history and the present, and in opening space for thinking about alternative timelines and modernities. We thus argue that periodization can have an important role in breaking through the temporal and historical boundaries limiting our understandings of international politics.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

REFERENCES

ASHLEY, Richard.1988. “Untying the Sovereign States: double readings of the anarchy problematique”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. v. 17, n. 2, p. 227-262.,

BARTELSON, Jens. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BARTELSON, Jens. 2007. “Philosophy and History in the Study of Politics Thought”. Journal of Philosophy of History, v. 1, n. 1, p. 101-124.

BARTELSON, Jens. 2009. Visions of World Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

BARTELSON, Jens. 2011. “What is wrong with the world?”. Contemporary Political Theory, v. 10, n. 2, Critical Exchange on R.B.J. Walker’s After the Globe, Before the World, p. 288-290.

BLANEY, David; INAYATULLAH, Naeem. 2010. Savage Economics: Wealth, poverty and the temporal walls of capitalism. London and New York: Routledge.

BOTELHO, André. 2008. Uma Sociedade em Movimento e sua Intelligentisia: Apresentação. In: BOTELHO, André; BASTOS, Elide Rugai; and BÔAS, Glaucia Villas. O Moderno em Questão: A Década de 1950 no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks.

BUZAN, Barry; LITTLE, Richard. 1996. “Reconceptualizing Anarchy: Structural Realism Meets World History”. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, n. 4, p.403-438.

CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

DAVIS, Kathleen. 2008. Periodization and Sovereignty. How ideas of feudalism and secularization govern the politics of time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

FASOLT, Constantin. 2004 The limits of history. Chicago: University of Chicago.

FOUCAULT, Michel. 2002 The order of things. New York and London: Routledge.

HOM, Andrew; STEELE, Brent. 2010. “Open Horizons: the temporal visions of reflexive realism”. International Studies Review, v. 10, p. 271-300.

HUTCHINGS, Kimberly. 2008. Time and World Politics. Thinking the Present. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

LINKLATER, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

LINKLATER, Andrew. 2007. Critical Theory and World Politics. Citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London and New York: Routledge.

LUNDBORG, Tom. 2012. The Politics of the Event. Time, movement, becoming. London and New York: Routledge.

OSBORNE, Peter. 1992. “Modernity is a qualitative, not a chronological, category”. New Left Review, I/192, p.65-84.

ONUF, Nicholas. (Forthcoming) Seven Metaphors in Search of a Good Story. In: NOGUEIRA, João Pontes and WALKER, R.B.J. (eds.). International Relations and the (Re)Invention of History. London and New York: Routledge.

PHILPOTT, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in sovereignty: how ideas shaped modern international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

REUS-SMIT, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

RUGGIE, John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: problematizing modernity in International Relations”. International Organization, vol. 47, no.1, pp.139-174.

SPRUYT, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and its Competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

WALKER, R.B.J. 2010. After the Globe, Before the World. London and New York: Routledge.

WALKER, R.B.J. 2011. “World, Politics”. Contemporary Political Theory, v. 10, n. 2, Critical Exchange on R.B.J. Walker’s After the Globe, Before the World, pp. 303–310.

Publicado
15-12-2015
Como Citar
Lage, V. C., & Chamon, P. H. de O. (2015). Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson. Carta Internacional, 10(3), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v10n3.2015.340
Seção
Artigos